Skip to main content

When Religion is Attacked...for the Right Reasons

Religion, if it’s any good at all, has always been under attack.  Not because of its claim of righteousness, or its attempts at some lofty holiness, or because of its fundamentalism.  Historically, the best religion, the healthiest and courageous and most dangerous religion, has been attacked because of its struggle against systems of corruption, of injustice, of brutality, of exploitation and other crimes against humanity.

Jesus was crucified for these very reasons.  People of religion over the years created these elaborate and complicated and puzzling and sometimes preposterous doctrines and ideologies about salvation and atonement and the rapture and the second coming and eternal damnation and so forth as a way of attempting to interpret scripture.  But Jesus was not killed for any of that.  He was killed for attempting to stand against the cruelty and injustices and inhumanity of the Roman Empire.  He was killed for his impatience with institutional religion and his call to reform it.  He was killed by politicians and the most religious people of his day.

They are still threatened by him.  By the real Jesus.

All of the mean hyped up Christianity of today has nothing really to do with the historical Jesus.   It’s mostly selfish and phony, shallow and close minded, and often harmful and destructive.  Robust Christianity, courageous real Jesus following Christianity, should clearly and courageously be for civil rights, gay rights, abortion rights, and women’s rights.  It should be a forceful influence on government.  It should be a healthy example to society.  But it has no business running the government, which too much of contemporary Christianity seems obsessed with doing.  Government has always worked best when it has been allowed to be a secular, human institution of laws and services for its citizens.  It is weakened and corrupted when it attempts to be the voice of any religious persuasion.

If you are opposed to gay rights, to abortion, to equal rights because of your religious views then fine, stand your ground defending your views—in your church, in your life.  But don’t go be a politician or elect a politician in order to get the government to promote your religious viewpoints.  And if you’re going to be a Christian then at least study the life and teachings of Jesus Christ.  He was not a fundamentalist right wing Republican Tea Party millionaire capitalist.  He was not a person of means.  He wasn’t even married.  He was humble.  He was intelligent and well educated.  He taught simple lessons of compassion and grace.  He fought for the sick and the left out, for children and widows, for people possessed by addictions and mental illness.  He loved others with gracious generosity.  He had no ambition for power, affluence or control.  If you tell me he would turn away gays or women who have had an abortion or people struggling with alcohol or not fight for the rights of minorities, or be callous towards women and their right to care for their own bodies, then I would tell you go back and read your New Testament.  If all you read is the Sermon on the Mount and the Beatitudes (Matthew 5-7), then you cannot morally defend the loud hostile cries of Christians today against the most vulnerable in our nation and in our world.

We’ve been through Easter and Passover and believers are back to the hard task now of living out their faith, of putting into practice all of that death and resurrection and high festivals and holy days, living it out in the home and the workplace and wherever humanity meets them.  That is where the real tests happen and where if you have any faith at all it should unfold in acts of love, of courage, of standing for the vulnerable and the hurting, and standing against the corrupt and angry and selfish and exploitive systems of our day.

The late British philosopher, Karl Popper, once wrote, “I am therefore in favor of democratically elected, constitutional government, which is quite different from rule by the people.  And I am in favor of accountable government—accountable first of all to those who elected it, but also, perhaps still more, morally responsible to humanity.” 

Accountable government morally responsible to humanity.  That is far different from rule by the people, which has become a fascination with fundamentalist right wing religion and politics. 

Religion that stands for the former will most likely get attacked, and for all the right reasons.

© 2013 Timothy Moody

Popular posts from this blog

The Light in the Faces of Our Incredible Human Family

National Geographic Journalist Paul Salopek is walking across the world on foot to trace the pathways of the first humans who wandered out of Africa in the Stone Age to claim the earth as theirs. His journey will cover 21,000 miles and is estimated to take 10 years. He is four years into his massive expedition and already he has discovered that humanity is mostly kind and generous, welcoming and caring, hard-working and disciplined.
I watched a brief piece about Salopek’s journey on the PBS News Hour this week. I have included a link below.
What is extraordinary about his adventure is his realization that in spite of all the wars and turmoil across the globe, he has learned that “The world is an incredibly hospitable place.” In following the ancient trade route called “The Silk Road,” Salopek has gotten to know a variety of people young and old. And though he has so far encountered a few dangerous situations where he had his water supply stolen, was once ambushed by raiders, and was sho…

Our National Lack of Self-esteem

There is a brokenness in our society, a pervasive moral collapse, a reckless disregard for community, neighborliness, courtesy, and compassion.
Our government leads by this example. Both parties are incompetent to guide us into a more responsible living, into a serviceable structure of humanity. Our leaders are dominated by greedy oligarchs who don’t just want more, they want everything, even if it costs our society its dignity, its soul, even its future.
What is on display here daily is a wretched lack of self-esteem. The loss now influences all of us. We’re all affected in ways that keep us shamed by our actions.
When we feel powerless, aimless, without any higher goals than the accumulation of things and the momentary thrill, we then mute our intelligence. We live by raw emotions—anger, appetite, urges. We don’t think, we don’t consider, we merely react. We push. We disregard. We threaten. We act out. And we fail.
Self-esteem is a learned process. It builds on genuine successes that ar…

Is the Soul Solid, like Iron?

Mary Oliver has a beautiful little poem in which she asks:

“Is the soul solid, like iron?
or is it tender and breakable, like
the wings of a moth in the beak of the owl?”

It is both.

The soul, we are told by philosophers, theologians, and mystics, is our essence, the permanence of our true self. It is that part of us that lives beyond death. Or so we are taught by religion. Where exactly the soul exists beyond that, has of course, been long debated.

There are times in life when something deep within us is, as Mary Oliver says, solid as iron and we operate out of some sense of aliveness, confidence, and inner strength. It may be fleeting, but there when needed; or it may carry us through long periods of endurance when we build a sturdy self, confident and capable of our abilities and talents.

This is the work of the soul. This is a part of our spiritual development. This is what enables us to believe there are forces in life, loving and generous and mystical, that nurture and compel us tow…